IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v55y2006i1p123-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Poisson variation of intestinal tumour multiplicity in mice carrying a Robertsonian translocation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Newton
  • David I. Hastie

Abstract

Summary. Tumour multiplicity is a frequently measured phenotype in animal studies of cancer biology. Poisson variation of this measurement represents a biological and statistical reference point that is usually violated, even in highly controlled experiments, owing to sources of variation in the stochastic process of tumour formation. A recent experiment on murine intestinal tumours presented conditions which seem to generate Poisson‐distributed tumour counts. If valid, this would support a claim about mechanisms by which the adenomatous polyposis coli gene is inactivated during tumour initiation. In considering hypothesis testing strategies, model choice and Bayesian approaches, we quantify the positive evidence favouring Poisson variation in this experiment. Statistical techniques used include likelihood ratio testing, the Bayes and Akaike information criteria, negative binomial modelling, reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo methods and posterior predictive checking. The posterior approximation that is based on the Bayes information criterion is found to be quite accurate in this small n case‐study.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Newton & David I. Hastie, 2006. "Assessing Poisson variation of intestinal tumour multiplicity in mice carrying a Robertsonian translocation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 55(1), pages 123-138, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:55:y:2006:i:1:p:123-138
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00528.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00528.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00528.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael A. Newton & Linda Clipson & Andrew T. Thliveris & Richard B. Halberg, 2006. "A Statistical Test of the Hypothesis that Polyclonal Intestinal Tumors Arise by Random Collision of Initiated Clones," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 721-727, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:55:y:2006:i:1:p:123-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.