IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v54y2005i4p691-706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multivariate tests comparing binomial probabilities, with application to safety studies for drugs

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Agresti
  • Bernhard Klingenberg

Abstract

Summary. In magazine advertisements for new drugs, it is common to see summary tables that compare the relative frequency of several side‐effects for the drug and for a placebo, based on results from placebo‐controlled clinical trials. The paper summarizes ways to conduct a global test of equality of the population proportions for the drug and the vector of population proportions for the placebo. For multivariate normal responses, the Hotelling T2‐test is a well‐known method for testing equality of a vector of means for two independent samples. The tests in the paper are analogues of this test for vectors of binary responses. The likelihood ratio tests can be computationally intensive or have poor asymptotic performance. Simple quadratic forms comparing the two vectors provide alternative tests. Much better performance results from using a score‐type version with a null‐estimated covariance matrix than from the sample covariance matrix that applies with an ordinary Wald test. For either type of statistic, asymptotic inference is often inadequate, so we also present alternative, exact permutation tests. Follow‐up inferences are also discussed, and our methods are applied to safety data from a phase II clinical trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Agresti & Bernhard Klingenberg, 2005. "Multivariate tests comparing binomial probabilities, with application to safety studies for drugs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(4), pages 691-706, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:54:y:2005:i:4:p:691-706
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.05437.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.05437.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.05437.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Klingenberg & A. Solari & L. Salmaso & F. Pesarin, 2009. "Testing Marginal Homogeneity Against Stochastic Order in Multivariate Ordinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 452-462, June.
    2. Eleftheraki, Anastasia G. & Kateri, Maria & Ntzoufras, Ioannis, 2009. "Bayesian analysis of two dependent 22 contingency tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2724-2732, May.
    3. Bernhard Klingenberg & Alan Agresti, 2006. "Multivariate Extensions of McNemar's Test," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 921-928, September.
    4. Alan Agresti & Sabrina Giordano & Anna Gottard, 2022. "A Review of Score-Test-Based Inference for Categorical Data," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 20(1), pages 31-48, September.
    5. Klingenberg, Bernhard & Satopää, Ville, 2013. "Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing margins of multivariate binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 87-98.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:54:y:2005:i:4:p:691-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.