IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v52y2003i3p291-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian compartmental model for the evaluation of 1,3‐butadiene metabolism

Author

Listed:
  • Maura Mezzetti
  • Joseph G. Ibrahim
  • Frédéric Y. Bois
  • Louise M. Ryan
  • Long Ngo
  • Thomas J. Smith

Abstract

Summary. We propose a Bayesian model for physiologically based pharmacokinetics of 1,3‐butadiene (BD). BD is classified as a suspected human carcinogen and exposure to it is common, especially through cigarette smoke as well as in urban settings. The main aim of the methodology and analysis that are presented here is to quantify variability in the rates of BD metabolism by human subjects. A three‐compartmental model is described, together with informative prior distributions for the population parameters, all of which represent real physiological variables. The model is described in detail along with the meanings and interpretations of the associated parameters. A four‐compartment model is also given for comparison. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are described for fitting the model proposed. The model is fitted to toxicokinetic data obtained from 133 healthy subjects (males and females) from the four major racial groups in the USA, with ages ranging from 19 to 62 years. Subjects were exposed to 2 parts per million of BD for 20 min through a face mask by using a computer‐controlled exposure and respiratory monitoring system. Stratification by ethnic group results in major changes in the physiological parameters. Sex and age were also tested but not found to have a significant effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Maura Mezzetti & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Frédéric Y. Bois & Louise M. Ryan & Long Ngo & Thomas J. Smith, 2003. "A Bayesian compartmental model for the evaluation of 1,3‐butadiene metabolism," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(3), pages 291-305, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:52:y:2003:i:3:p:291-305
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00405
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9876.00405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mitchell J. Small, 2008. "Methods for Assessing Uncertainty in Fundamental Assumptions and Associated Models for Cancer Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1289-1308, October.
    2. Céline Brochot & Frédéric Y. Bois, 2005. "Use of a Chemical Probe to Increase Safety for Human Volunteers in Toxicokinetic Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1559-1571, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:52:y:2003:i:3:p:291-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.