IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v50y2001i3p251-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of the basic reproduction number for infectious diseases from age‐stratified serological survey data

Author

Listed:
  • C. P. Farrington
  • M. N. Kanaan
  • N. J. Gay

Abstract

The basic reproduction number of an infection, R0, is the average number of secondary infections generated by a single typical infective individual in a totally susceptible population. It is directly related to the effort required to eliminate infection. We consider statistical methods for estimating R0 from age‐stratified serological survey data. The main difficulty is indeterminacy, since the contacts between individuals of different ages are not observed. We show that, given an estimate of the average age‐specific hazard of infection, a particular leading left eigenfunction is required to specify R0. We review existing methods of estimation in the light of this indeterminacy. We suggest using data from several infections transmitted via the same route, and we propose that the choice of model be guided by a criterion based on similarity of their contact functions. This approach also allows model uncertainty to be taken into account. If one infection induces no lasting immunity, we show that the only additional assumption required to estimate R0 is that the contact function is symmetric. When matched data on two or more infections transmitted by the same route are available, the methods may be extended to incorporate the effect of individual heterogeneity. The approach can also be applied in partially vaccinated populations and to populations comprising loosely linked communities. The methods are illustrated with data on hepatitis A, mumps, rubella, parvovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b and measles infection.

Suggested Citation

  • C. P. Farrington & M. N. Kanaan & N. J. Gay, 2001. "Estimation of the basic reproduction number for infectious diseases from age‐stratified serological survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 50(3), pages 251-292.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:3:p:251-292
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00233
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9876.00233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven Abrams & Marc Aerts & Geert Molenberghs & Niel Hens, 2017. "Parametric overdispersed frailty models for current status data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1388-1400, December.
    2. Kimberly M. Thompson, 2016. "Evolution and Use of Dynamic Transmission Models for Measles and Rubella Risk and Policy Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(7), pages 1383-1403, July.
    3. H. J. Whitaker & C. P. Farrington, 2004. "Infections with Varying Contact Rates: Application to Varicella," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 615-623, September.
    4. Lahrouz, A. & El Mahjour, H. & Settati, A. & Bernoussi, A., 2018. "Dynamics and optimal control of a non-linear epidemic model with relapse and cure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 299-317.
    5. P. Kriwy, 2012. "Similarity of parents and physicians in the decision to vaccinate children against measles, mumps and rubella," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(2), pages 333-340, April.
    6. Kimberly M. Thompson & Cassie L. Odahowski, 2016. "Systematic Review of Measles and Rubella Serology Studies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(7), pages 1459-1486, July.
    7. Jair Andrade & Jim Duggan, 2021. "A Bayesian approach to calibrate system dynamics models using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(4), pages 283-309, October.
    8. Wen, Chi-Chung & Chen, Yi-Hau, 2011. "Nonparametric maximum likelihood analysis of clustered current status data with the gamma-frailty Cox model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1053-1060, February.
    9. Schimit, P.H.T. & Monteiro, L.H.A., 2012. "On estimating the basic reproduction number in distinct stages of a contagious disease spreading," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 156-160.
    10. Ziv Shkedy & Marc Aerts & Geert Molenberghs & Philippe Beutels & Pierre Van Damme, 2003. "Modelling forces of infection by using monotone local polynomials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 469-485, October.
    11. Steffen Unkel & C. Paddy Farrington & Heather J. Whitaker & Richard Pebody, 2014. "Time varying frailty models and the estimation of heterogeneities in transmission of infectious diseases," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 141-158, January.
    12. Nele Goeyvaerts & Niel Hens & Benson Ogunjimi & Marc Aerts & Ziv Shkedy & Pierre Van Damme & Philippe Beutels, 2010. "Estimating infectious disease parameters from data on social contacts and serological status," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(2), pages 255-277, March.
    13. Tao Hu & Qingyun Du & Fu Ren & Shi Liang & Denan Lin & Jiajia Li & Yan Chen, 2014. "Spatial Analysis of the Home Addresses of Hospital Patients with Hepatitis B Infection or Hepatoma in Shenzhen, China from 2010 to 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:3:p:251-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.