IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v41y1992i1p191-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression

Author

Listed:
  • S. le Cessie
  • J. C. van Houwelingen

Abstract

In this paper it is shown how ridge estimators can be used in logistic regression to improve the parameter estimates and to diminish the error made by further predictions. Different ways to choose the unknown ridge parameter are discussed. The main attention focuses on ridge parameters obtained by cross‐validation. Three different ways to define the prediction error are considered: classification error, squared error and minus log‐likelihood. The use of ridge regression is illustrated by developing a prognostic index for the two‐year survival probability of patients with ovarian cancer as a function of their deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) histogram. In this example, the number of covariates is large compared with the number of observations and modelling without restrictions on the parameters leads to overfitting. Defining a restriction on the parameters, such that neighbouring intervals in the DNA histogram differ only slightly in their influence on the survival, yields ridge‐type parameter estimates with reasonable values which can be clinically interpreted. Furthermore the model can predict new observations more accurately.

Suggested Citation

  • S. le Cessie & J. C. van Houwelingen, 1992. "Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 41(1), pages 191-201, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:41:y:1992:i:1:p:191-201
    DOI: 10.2307/2347628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2347628
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2347628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:41:y:1992:i:1:p:191-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.