IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v31y1982i1p23-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrimination with Mixed Binary and Continuous Data

Author

Listed:
  • I. G. Vlachonikolis
  • F. H. C. Marriott

Abstract

This paper consists of a case study in the use of different methods of Discriminant analysis. Methods used include Fisher's Linear discriminant function, various modifications of this technique, Logistic discrimination and Kernel methods using jack‐knife maximum likelihood. These methods are applied on two sets of data. Their success is compared using the proportions misclassified, estimated by the “leaving‐one‐out” method where possible.

Suggested Citation

  • I. G. Vlachonikolis & F. H. C. Marriott, 1982. "Discrimination with Mixed Binary and Continuous Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(1), pages 23-31, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:31:y:1982:i:1:p:23-31
    DOI: 10.2307/2347071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2347071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2347071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leung, Chi-Ying, 1999. "Covariance Adjustments in Discrimination of Mixed Discrete and Continuous Variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 111-124, October.
    2. Krzanowski, W. J., 1995. "Selection of variables, and assessment of their performance, in mixed-variable discriminant analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 419-431, April.
    3. Ioannis G. Vlachonikolis & Dimitris A. Karras & Manolis J. Hatzakis & Nicholas Paritsis, 2000. "Improved Statistical Classification Methods in Computerized Psychiatric Diagnosis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 20(1), pages 95-103, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:31:y:1982:i:1:p:23-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.