IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v22y1973i2p141-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Analysis of Factorial Experiments and Orthogonal Fractions

Author

Listed:
  • P. L. Goldsmith
  • R. Boddy

Abstract

Conclusions drawn from unreplicated factorial and fractional factorial experiments can be quite misleading when the data include one or more spurious values or when two results have been erroneously interchanged. The recognition of such occurrences may reduce the residual mean square to one‐tenth of its previous value and markedly change the estimated size and significance of the factor effects. A procedure for identifying spurious values is described. Each response value in turn is treated as missing and an empirical significance test is applied to the least of the residual mean squares. The procedure is repeated in a search for further spurious values and is followed by a search for interchanged results. In certain cases an aberrant cell may only be partially indentifiable. The whole critical analysis is embodied in a computer program, which includes analysis of variance before and after amendments to the data and lists individual residuals. Any orthogonal experimental design can be accommodated and the user has control over the model which is fitted: missing values are also permitted. Two examples of the critical analysis are described in detail and a summary is given of the result of applying the method to 23 sets of data in the statistical literature.

Suggested Citation

  • P. L. Goldsmith & R. Boddy, 1973. "Critical Analysis of Factorial Experiments and Orthogonal Fractions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 22(2), pages 141-160, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:22:y:1973:i:2:p:141-160
    DOI: 10.2307/2346916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2346916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2346916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:22:y:1973:i:2:p:141-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.