IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v67y2005i2p235-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ascent‐based Monte Carlo expectation– maximization

Author

Listed:
  • Brian S. Caffo
  • Wolfgang Jank
  • Galin L. Jones

Abstract

Summary. The expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm is a popular tool for maximizing likelihood functions in the presence of missing data. Unfortunately, EM often requires the evaluation of analytically intractable and high dimensional integrals. The Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) algorithm is the natural extension of EM that employs Monte Carlo methods to estimate the relevant integrals. Typically, a very large Monte Carlo sample size is required to estimate these integrals within an acceptable tolerance when the algorithm is near convergence. Even if this sample size were known at the onset of implementation of MCEM, its use throughout all iterations is wasteful, especially when accurate starting values are not available. We propose a data‐driven strategy for controlling Monte Carlo resources in MCEM. The algorithm proposed improves on similar existing methods by recovering EM's ascent (i.e. likelihood increasing) property with high probability, being more robust to the effect of user‐defined inputs and handling classical Monte Carlo and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods within a common framework. Because of the first of these properties we refer to the algorithm as ‘ascent‐based MCEM’. We apply ascent‐based MCEM to a variety of examples, including one where it is used to accelerate the convergence of deterministic EM dramatically.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian S. Caffo & Wolfgang Jank & Galin L. Jones, 2005. "Ascent‐based Monte Carlo expectation– maximization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 235-251, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:67:y:2005:i:2:p:235-251
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00499.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00499.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00499.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jimin Ding & Jane-Ling Wang, 2008. "Modeling Longitudinal Data with Nonparametric Multiplicative Random Effects Jointly with Survival Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 546-556, June.
    2. Augustyniak, Maciej, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the Markov-switching GARCH model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 61-75.
    3. Yi Xiong & W. John Braun & X. Joan Hu, 2021. "Estimating duration distribution aided by auxiliary longitudinal measures in presence of missing time origin," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 388-412, July.
    4. Sik-Yum Lee & Xin-Yuan Song, 2007. "A Unified Maximum Likelihood Approach for Analyzing Structural Equation Models With Missing Nonstandard Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 35(3), pages 352-381, February.
    5. Hamdy F. F. Mahmoud & Inyoung Kim, 2023. "Semiparametric Integrated and Additive Spatio-Temporal Single-Index Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Y. K. Tseng & Y. R. Su & M. Mao & J. L. Wang, 2015. "An extended hazard model with longitudinal covariates," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(1), pages 135-150.
    7. Dominik Bertsche & Robin Braun, 2022. "Identification of Structural Vector Autoregressions by Stochastic Volatility," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 328-341, January.
    8. Wang, Yong, 2010. "Fisher scoring: An interpolation family and its Monte Carlo implementations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(7), pages 1744-1755, July.
    9. Koutchad, P. & Carpentier, A. & Femenia, F., 2018. "Dealing with corner solutions in multi-crop micro-econometric models: an endogenous regime approach with regime fixed costs," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277530, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Koutchadé, Philippe & Carpentier, Alain & Féménia, Fabienne, 2015. "Empirical modelling of production decisions of heterogeneous farmers with mixed models," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205098, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Elff, Martin & Heisig, Jan Paul & Schaeffer, Merlin & Shikano, Susumu, 2016. "No Need to Turn Bayesian in Multilevel Analysis with Few Clusters: How Frequentist Methods Provide Unbiased Estimates and Accurate Inference," SocArXiv z65s4, Center for Open Science.
    12. Fentaw Abegaz & Ernst Wit, 2015. "Copula Gaussian graphical models with penalized ascent Monte Carlo EM algorithm," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 69(4), pages 419-441, November.
    13. Peng, Mengjiao & Xiang, Liming & Wang, Shanshan, 2018. "Semiparametric regression analysis of clustered survival data with semi-competing risks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 53-70.
    14. Koutchade, Philippe & Carpentier, Alain & Femenia, Fabienne, 2015. "Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in micro-econometric agricultural production models: a random parameter approach," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212015, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Koutchade, Philippe & Carpentier, Alain & Féménia, Fabienne, 2015. "Empirical modeling of production decisions of heterogeneous farmers with random parameter models," Working Papers 210097, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    16. William C. L. Stewart & Elizabeth A. Thompson, 2006. "Improving Estimates of Genetic Maps: A Maximum Likelihood Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 728-734, September.
    17. Koutchade, Obafèmi Philippe & Carpentier, Alain & Femenia, Fabienne, 2015. "Corner solutions in empirical acreage choice models: an andogeneous switching regime approach with regime fixed cost," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 206060, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Yue, Chen & Chen, Shaojie & Sair, Haris I. & Airan, Raag & Caffo, Brian S., 2015. "Estimating a graphical intra-class correlation coefficient (GICC) using multivariate probit-linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 126-133.
    19. F. Nathoo & C. B. Dean, 2007. "A Mixed Mover–Stayer Model for Spatiotemporal Two-State Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 881-891, September.
    20. Brentnall, Adam R. & Crowder, Martin J. & Hand, David J., 2011. "Approximate repeated-measures shrinkage," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1150-1159, February.
    21. F. Y. Kuo & W. T. M. Dunsmuir & I. H. Sloan & M. P. Wand & R. S. Womersley, 2008. "Quasi-Monte Carlo for Highly Structured Generalised Response Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 239-275, June.
    22. Florence Chaubert-Pereira & Yann Guédon & Christian Lavergne & Catherine Trottier, 2010. "Markov and Semi-Markov Switching Linear Mixed Models Used to Identify Forest Tree Growth Components," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 753-762, September.
    23. Kunling Wu & Lang Wu, 2007. "Generalized linear mixed models with informative dropouts and missing covariates," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 1-18, July.
    24. Trevezas, S. & Malefaki, S. & Cournède, P.-H., 2014. "Parameter estimation via stochastic variants of the ECM algorithm with applications to plant growth modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 82-99.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:67:y:2005:i:2:p:235-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.