IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v183y2020i3p691-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple‐systems analysis for the quantification of modern slavery: classical and Bayesian approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard W. Silverman

Abstract

Multiple‐systems estimation is a key approach for quantifying hidden populations such as the number of victims of modern slavery. The UK Government published an estimate of 10000–13000 victims, constructed by the present author, as part of the strategy leading to the Modern Slavery Act 2015. This estimate was obtained by a stepwise multiple‐systems method based on six lists. Further investigation shows that a small proportion of the possible models give rather different answers, and that other model fitting approaches may choose one of these. Three data sets collected in the field of modern slavery, together with a data set about the death toll in the Kosovo conflict, are used to investigate the stability and robustness of various multiple‐systems‐estimate methods. The crucial aspect is the way that interactions between lists are modelled, because these can substantially affect the results. Model selection and Bayesian approaches are considered in detail, in particular to assess their stability and robustness when applied to real modern slavery data. A new Markov chain Monte Carlo Bayesian approach is developed; overall, this gives robust and stable results at least for the examples considered. The software and data sets are freely and publicly available to facilitate wider implementation and further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard W. Silverman, 2020. "Multiple‐systems analysis for the quantification of modern slavery: classical and Bayesian approaches," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 691-736, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:183:y:2020:i:3:p:691-736
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12505
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosa Lavelle-Hill & Gavin Smith & Anjali Mazumder & Todd Landman & James Goulding, 2021. "Machine learning methods for “wicked” problems: exploring the complex drivers of modern slavery," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Olivier Binette & Rebecca C. Steorts, 2022. "On the reliability of multiple systems estimation for the quantification of modern slavery," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(2), pages 640-676, April.
    3. Doreen S. Boyd & Bertrand Perrat & Xiaodong Li & Bethany Jackson & Todd Landman & Feng Ling & Kevin Bales & Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick & James Goulding & Stuart Marsh & Giles M. Foody, 2021. "Informing action for United Nations SDG target 8.7 and interdependent SDGs: Examining modern slavery from space," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Matthew R. Schofield & Richard J. Barker & William A. Link & Heloise Pavanato, 2023. "Estimating population size: The importance of model and estimator choice," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3803-3817, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:183:y:2020:i:3:p:691-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.