IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v182y2019i4p1287-1311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The law of equal opportunities or unintended consequences?: The effect of unisex risk assessment in consumer credit

Author

Listed:
  • Galina Andreeva
  • Anna Matuszyk

Abstract

Gender is prohibited from use in decision making in many countries. This does not necessarily benefit females in situations of automated algorithmic decisions, e.g. when a credit scoring model is used as a decision tool for loan granting. By analysing a unique proprietary data set on car loans from a European bank, the paper shows that gender as a variable in a credit scoring model is statistically significant. Its removal does not alter the predictive accuracy of the model, yet the proportions of accepted women/men depend on whether gender is included. The paper explores the association between predictors in the model with gender, to demonstrate the omitted variable bias and how other variables proxy for gender. It points to inconsistencies of the existing regulations in the context of automated decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Galina Andreeva & Anna Matuszyk, 2019. "The law of equal opportunities or unintended consequences?: The effect of unisex risk assessment in consumer credit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1287-1311, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:182:y:2019:i:4:p:1287-1311
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12494
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:182:y:2019:i:4:p:1287-1311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.