IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v181y2018i2p351-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative behaviour absent re‐election incentives: findings from a natural experiment in the Arkansas Senate

Author

Listed:
  • Rocío Titiunik
  • Andrew Feher

Abstract

We analyse the effect of removing re‐election incentives on the individual legislative participation of state lawmakers by using an original study based on the random assignment of term length that occurs in the Arkansas Senate, which in turn induces the random assignment of the total number of terms each senator may serve. Across five measures of legislative output—bills introduced, bills passed, bills cosponsored, resolutions and abstention rates, we cannot reject the null hypothesis of no effect. Since our sample is small, we adopt two strategies in our statistical analysis: we perform randomization‐based inference to ensure that our tests adequately control size, and we use tests of equivalence to avoid incorrectly concluding that the effects are null because of low power. We also use bounds as a robustness check to address attrition in our original experimental sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocío Titiunik & Andrew Feher, 2018. "Legislative behaviour absent re‐election incentives: findings from a natural experiment in the Arkansas Senate," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(2), pages 351-378, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:181:y:2018:i:2:p:351-378
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian R. Grose & Abby K. Wood, 2020. "Randomized experiments by government institutions and American political development," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 401-413, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:181:y:2018:i:2:p:351-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.