IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v158y1995i3p563-574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the Class‐Party Relationship in Britain, 1964–92

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Heath
  • Geoffrey Evans
  • Clive Payne

Abstract

The changing relationship between class and political party in Britain has been the subject of considerable debate among social scientists, much of it about the measures used to identify patterns of change. The paper updates previous work by extending it to the most recent British election, by comparing different procedures for allocating respondents to classes, and by using a recently developed log‐multiplicative ('UNIDIFF“) model which is especially appropriate for testing whether or not classes have converged in their voting behaviour. The analysis confirms and strengthens previous interpretations which have argued that the class basis of partisanship is not in continuing decline.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Heath & Geoffrey Evans & Clive Payne, 1995. "Modelling the Class‐Party Relationship in Britain, 1964–92," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 158(3), pages 563-574, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:158:y:1995:i:3:p:563-574
    DOI: 10.2307/2983446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2983446
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2983446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:158:y:1995:i:3:p:563-574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.