IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v75y2024i5p567-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is googling risky? A study on risk perception and experiences of adverse consequences in web search

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Häußler
  • Sebastian Schultheiß
  • Dirk Lewandowski

Abstract

Search engines, such as Google, have a considerable impact on society. Therefore, undesirable consequences, such as retrieving incorrect search results, pose a risk to users. Although previous research has reported the adverse outcomes of web search, little is known about how search engine users evaluate those outcomes. In this study, we show which aspects of web search are perceived as risky using a sample (N = 3884) representative of the German Internet population. We found that many participants are often concerned with adverse consequences immediately appearing on the search engine result page. For example, 45.2% of respondents are concerned about retrieving incorrect information. In contrast, consequences with a delayed impact are rarely perceived as a risk. Moreover, participants' experiences with adverse consequences are directly related to their risk perception. Our results demonstrate that people perceive risks related to web search. In addition to our study, there is a need for more independent research on the possible detrimental outcomes of web search to monitor and mitigate risks. Apart from risks for individuals, search engines with a massive number of users have an extraordinary impact on society; therefore, the acceptable risks of web search should be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Häußler & Sebastian Schultheiß & Dirk Lewandowski, 2024. "Is googling risky? A study on risk perception and experiences of adverse consequences in web search," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(5), pages 567-580, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:5:p:567-580
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24802
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:5:p:567-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.