IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v74y2023i13p1550-1564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach to assess the quality of Jupyter projects published by GLAM institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Candela
  • Sally Chambers
  • Tim Sherratt

Abstract

GLAM organizations have been digitizing their collections and making them available for the public for several decades. Recent methods for publishing digital collections such as “GLAM Labs” and “Collections as Data” provide guidelines for the application of computational methods to reuse the contents of cultural heritage institutions in innovative and creative ways. Jupyter Notebooks have become a powerful tool to foster use of these collections by digital humanities researchers. Based on previous approaches for quality assessment, which have been adapted for cultural heritage collections, this paper proposes a methodology for assessing the quality of projects based on Jupyter Notebooks published by relevant GLAM institutions. A list of projects based on Jupyter Notebooks using cultural heritage data has been evaluated. Common features and best practices have been identified. A detailed analysis, that can be useful for organizations interested in creating their own Jupyter Notebooks projects, has been provided. Open issues requiring further work and additional avenues for exploration are outlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Candela & Sally Chambers & Tim Sherratt, 2023. "An approach to assess the quality of Jupyter projects published by GLAM institutions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(13), pages 1550-1564, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:13:p:1550-1564
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24835
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:13:p:1550-1564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.