IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i2p253-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing a discussion on paradigm shift(s) in the field of information

Author

Listed:
  • Rong Tang
  • Bharat Mehra
  • Jia Tina Du
  • Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao

Abstract

In this opinion paper, we frame a discussion on paradigm shift(s) in the field of information. We believe that in this astonishing historical moment of new directions and new opportunities both the existing paradigms and conceptual models in the field of information can benefit from re‐examination to stay current with the times. We propose a framework articulating key narratives associated with the why, what, how, and who dimensions to discuss paradigm shift(s). The purpose of this opinion paper is to initiate dialogues on ground‐breaking ideas and innovative solutions as well as support research that addresses contemporary challenges in the field of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong Tang & Bharat Mehra & Jia Tina Du & Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao, 2021. "Framing a discussion on paradigm shift(s) in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 253-258, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:2:p:253-258
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Fei Wu & Jessica Vitak & Michael T. Zimmer, 2020. "A contextual approach to information privacy research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(4), pages 485-490, April.
    2. Lisa M. Given & Rebekah Willson, 2018. "Information technology and the humanities scholar: Documenting digital research practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(6), pages 807-819, June.
    3. Dorte Madsen, 2016. "Liberating interdisciplinarity from myth. An exploration of the discursive construction of identities in information studies," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(11), pages 2697-2709, November.
    4. Elfreda A. Chatman, 1999. "A theory of life in the round," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(3), pages 207-217.
    5. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    6. Luanne Freund, 2015. "Contextualizing the information-seeking behavior of software engineers," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(8), pages 1594-1605, August.
    7. Tanya E. Clement & Daniel Carter, 2017. "Connecting theory and practice in digital humanities information work," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(6), pages 1385-1396, June.
    8. Bo Xie & Daqing He & Tim Mercer & Youfa Wang & Dan Wu & Kenneth R. Fleischmann & Yan Zhang & Linda H. Yoder & Keri K. Stephens & Michael Mackert & Min Kyung Lee, 2020. "Global health crises are also information crises: A call to action," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(12), pages 1419-1423, December.
    9. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    10. Blaise Cronin & Lokman I. Meho, 2008. "The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(4), pages 551-564, February.
    11. Marcia J. Bates, 1999. "The invisible substrate of information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(12), pages 1043-1050.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franklin Riley & David K. Allen & Thomas Daniel Wilson, 2022. "When politicians and the experts collide: Organization and the creation of information spheres," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1127-1139, August.
    2. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    3. Vanessa L. Kitzie & Travis L. Wagner & Valerie Lookingbill & Nicolas Vera, 2022. "Advancing information practices theoretical discourses centered on marginality, community, and embodiment: Learning from the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and as," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 494-510, April.
    4. Natalie Pang & Stan Karanasios & Misita Anwar, 2020. "Exploring the Information Worlds of Older Persons During Disasters," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 619-631, June.
    5. Ann Svensson, 2020. "Identifying Motives for Implementing eHealth by using Activity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Ngoc Quyet Le & Shankar Sankaran, 2023. "The importance of interactions in supporting online study," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 39(1), pages 105-113, January.
    7. Evaristo Kangwa, 2022. "Compatibility of Problem Solving Theory and Activity Theory," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 34-41, October.
    8. Isto Huvila & Heidi Enwald & Kristina Eriksson‐Backa & Ying‐Hsang Liu & Noora Hirvonen, 2022. "Information behavior and practices research informing information systems design," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 1043-1057, July.
    9. Aurora González-Teruel & Francisca Abad-García, 2018. "The influence of Elfreda Chatman’s theories: a citation context analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1793-1819, December.
    10. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    11. Sanna Kumpulainen & Elina Late, 2022. "Struggling with digitized historical newspapers: Contextual barriers to information interaction in history research activities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 1012-1024, July.
    12. Nelson, Sarah Beth & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Thomson, Leslie, 2017. "Mobility of knowledge work and affordances of digital technologies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 54-62.
    13. Dalton Lopes Martins & Daniela Lucas da Silva Lemos & Luis Felipe Rosa de Oliveira & Joyce Siqueira & Danielle do Carmo & Vinicius Nunes Medeiros, 2023. "Information organization and representation in digital cultural heritage in Brazil: Systematic mapping of information infrastructure in digital collections for data science applications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 707-726, June.
    14. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    15. Daniel Carter & Amelia Acker & Dan Sholler, 2021. "Investigative approaches to researching information technology companies," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 655-666, June.
    16. Yongjun Zhu & Erjia Yan, 2015. "Dynamic subfield analysis of disciplines: an examination of the trading impact and knowledge diffusion patterns of computer science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 335-359, July.
    17. Marcia J. Bates, 2021. "Search foundations: Toward a science of technology‐mediated experience. Sachi Arafat and Elham Ashoori. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 2019. 448, pp. $65.00 (hardback). (ISBN 9780262038591)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(3), pages 377-383, March.
    18. Amber L. Cushing & Páraic Kerrigan, 2022. "Personal information management burden: A framework for describing nonwork personal information management in the context of inequality," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1543-1558, November.
    19. John McLevey & Alexander V. Graham & Reid McIlroy-Young & Pierson Browne & Kathryn S. Plaisance, 2018. "Interdisciplinarity and insularity in the diffusion of knowledge: an analysis of disciplinary boundaries between philosophy of science and the sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 331-349, October.
    20. Barbara Mirel & Jennifer Steiner Tonks & Jean Song & Fan Meng & Weijian Xuan & Rafiqa Ameziane, 2013. "Studying PubMed usages in the field for complex problem solving: Implications for tool design," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(5), pages 874-892, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:2:p:253-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.