IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v66y2015i4p702-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How are icons processed by the brain? Neuroimaging measures of four types of visual stimuli used in information systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng-Cheng Huang
  • Randolph G. Bias
  • David Schnyer

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng-Cheng Huang & Randolph G. Bias & David Schnyer, 2015. "How are icons processed by the brain? Neuroimaging measures of four types of visual stimuli used in information systems," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(4), pages 702-720, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:66:y:2015:i:4:p:702-720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/asi.23210
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianfeng Wu & Dongfang Jiao & Chunfu Lu & Chengmin Li & Xiaofang Huang & Suzan Weng, 2022. "How Do Older Adults Process Icons in Visual Search Tasks? The Combined Effects of Icon Type and Cognitive Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Nuwan Waidyanatha & Lutz Frommberger, 2022. "Comprehension and appropriateness of complex mobile pictographs for crisis communication," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 583-604, October.
    3. Hye-Jin Jeon, 2020. "The Mechanism of Empathy and Relationship Commitment Through Emojis: Path to Perspective Taking, Inner Imitation, Emotional Empathy, and Relationship Commitment," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:66:y:2015:i:4:p:702-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.