This study examines differences in finance research productivity and influence across 661 academic institutions over the five-year period from 1989 through 1993. The authors find that forty institutions account for over 50 percent of all articles published by sixteen leading journals over the five-year period; sixty-six institutions account for two-thirds of the articles. Influence is more skewed, with as few as twenty institutions accounting for 50 percent of all citations to articles in these journals. The number of publications and publication influence increase with faculty size and academic accreditation. Prestigious business schools are associated with high publication productivity and influence. Coauthors are Robert J. Bricker, Kelly R. Brunarski, and Betty J. Simkins. Copyright 1995 by American Finance Association.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by American Finance Association in its journal Journal of Finance.
Volume (Year): 50 (1995) Issue (Month): 5 (December) Pages: 1691-1717 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML,
plain text,
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)