IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfinan/v49y1994i5p1905-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Poison Put Bonds: An Analysis of Their Economic Role

Author

Listed:
  • Cook, Douglas O
  • Easterwood, John C

Abstract

This article examines the effect of issuing debt with and without 'poison put' covenants on outstanding debt and equity claims for the period 1988 to 1989. The analysis shows that poison put covenants affect stockholders negatively and outstanding bondholders positively, while debt issued without such covenants has no effect. The study also finds a negative relationship between stock and bond returns for firms issuing poison put debt. These results are consistent with a 'mutual interest hypothesis,' which suggests that the issuance of poison put debt protects managers and, coincidentally, bondholders at the expense of stockholders. Copyright 1994 by American Finance Association.

Suggested Citation

  • Cook, Douglas O & Easterwood, John C, 1994. "Poison Put Bonds: An Analysis of Their Economic Role," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(5), pages 1905-1920, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:49:y:1994:i:5:p:1905-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1082%28199412%2949%3A5%3C1905%3APPBAAO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:49:y:1994:i:5:p:1905-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.