Using daily and monthly stock returns, the authors find no convincing evidence that Federal Reserve margin requirements have served to dampen stock market volatility. The contrary conclusion, expressed in recent papers by Gikas Hardouvelis (1988), is traced to flows in his test design. The authors do detect the expected negative relation between margin requirements and the amount of margin credit outstanding. They also confirm the recent finding by William Schwert (1988) that changes in margin requirements by the Fed have tended to follow, rather than lead, changes in market volatility. Copyright 1990 by American Finance Association.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by American Finance Association in its journal Journal of Finance.
Volume (Year): 45 (1990) Issue (Month): 1 (March) Pages: 3-29 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML,
plain text,
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)