IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v54y2020i1p342-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget Allocation Patterns of U.S. Households across Income Levels in the 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Tullaya Boonsaeng
  • Carlos E. Carpio

Abstract

This study examined the budget allocation patterns of U.S. households during the period 2000–2015. Four household groups—classified based on their income levels in relation to the federal poverty level—are used for the analyses. Data from the quarterly interview component of the BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey were used in order to calculate households' annual expenditures in eight commodity groups: food, utilities, apparel and apparel services, transportation, medical care, shelter and household operations, other nondurable expenditures and services, and durable goods. An exact affine stone index (EASI) demand system was used to estimate demand relationships (i.e., price, income elasticities, and marginal effects). Overall, we find that budget allocation, consumers' responses to changes in prices and income, and the effects of sociodemographic characteristics on spending can be markedly different between income groups. The use of a representative or average household for demand analyses can mask substantial differences in economic behaviors between these four income groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Tullaya Boonsaeng & Carlos E. Carpio, 2020. "Budget Allocation Patterns of U.S. Households across Income Levels in the 21st Century," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 342-387, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:54:y:2020:i:1:p:342-387
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12273
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:54:y:2020:i:1:p:342-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.