IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v60y2022i3p702-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Risks and Benefits of Differentiated Integration in the European Union as Perceived by Academic Experts

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Kröger
  • Thomas Loughran

Abstract

This article sheds light on how academic experts assess the benefits and risks of differentiated integration (DI) in the European Union (EU). DI denotes particular member states either being allowed to opt out of specific EU policies, or being excluded or exempted from participating in them until certain conditions are met. The findings of a novel expert survey (n = 95) highlight two key divisions amongst experts, namely, first a regional divide between scholars based in Western Europe and those based in Eastern Europe, with the former more favourable to DI than the latter; and second, a substantive divide between those, more numerous, who are favourable to DI, and those who are more critical. For the former, the perceived benefits outweigh the perceived risks. What drives the support of or objection to DI also differs between experts. Whereas supporters favour pragmatic reasons for DI, opponents mostly mobilize principled reasons against it.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Kröger & Thomas Loughran, 2022. "The Risks and Benefits of Differentiated Integration in the European Union as Perceived by Academic Experts," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 702-720, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:702-720
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13301
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Leruth & Stefan Gänzle & Jarle Trondal, 2019. "Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU after Brexit: Risks versus Opportunities," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1383-1394, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Kröger & Maria Dede, 2022. "Differentiated integration in the European Union: Its role for cooperating with nonmembers and for the EU’s future as perceived by academic experts," RSCAS Working Papers 2022/63, European University Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eick, Gianna Maria & Leruth, Benjamin, 2023. "A farewell to welfare? Conceptualising welfare populism, welfare chauvinism and welfare Euroscepticism," SocArXiv qbehr, Center for Open Science.
    2. Toni Haastrup & Heather Macrae & Annick Masselot & Alasdair Young & Milford Soko & Richard G. Whitman, 2022. "Editing ‘Europe’: Reflections from Inside, Outside and Beyond," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 853-866, July.
    3. Benjamin Leruth & Jarle Trondal & Stefan Gänzle, 2020. "Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 420-430.
    4. Reini Schrama & Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2020. "Going Nordic in European Administrative Networks?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 396-408.
    5. Benjamin Leruth & Jarle Trondal & Stefan Gänzle, 2020. "Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 89-99.
    6. Andriy Tyushka & David Phinnemore & Wolfgang Weiß, 2022. "Joint Institutional Frameworks in EU Bilateral Agreements: Joint Bodies, Rules and Principles, and Special Procedures," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1124-1143, July.
    7. Felix Biermann, 2023. "The Differentiation Paradox of European Integration: Why Going it Alone Produces Suboptimal Results," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 344-361, March.
    8. Reini Schrama & Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2020. "Going Nordic in European Administrative Networks?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 65-77.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:702-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.