IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v56y2018i5p1019-1035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rise and Fall of Merkozy: Franco†German Bilateralism as a Negotiation Strategy in Eurozone Crisis Management

Author

Listed:
  • Magnus G. Schoeller

Abstract

The close co†operation between French President Sarkozy and German Chancellor Merkel (‘Merkozy’) dominated a significant part of eurozone crisis management. Yet, after the election of a new French government in 2012, the Franco†German co†operation in the Economic and Monetary Union deteriorated. This article asks why the Franco†German tandem got stuck. Drawing on bargaining theory, it argues that Germany used ‘Merkozy’ as a negotiation strategy to further its aims in eurozone crisis management. However, when the preferences of the two countries were no longer reconcilable due to changes in France as well as in the negotiation environment, the strategy failed. Thus, while much of the literature has focused on the persistence of the Franco†German partnership, this approach accounts for variation in its functioning. The results provide an explanation for the rise and fall of Merkozy and bear implications for assessing the future Franco†German relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Magnus G. Schoeller, 2018. "The Rise and Fall of Merkozy: Franco†German Bilateralism as a Negotiation Strategy in Eurozone Crisis Management," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 1019-1035, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:5:p:1019-1035
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Blesse & Pierre C Boyer & Friedrich Heinemann & Eckhard Janeba & Anasuya Raj, 2019. "European Monetary Union reform preferences of French and German parliamentarians," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 406-424, September.
    2. Aukje van Loon, 2021. "European Financial Governance: FTT Reform, Controversies and Governments’ Responsiveness," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 208-218.
    3. Arnaud Lechevalier, 2018. "Social Europe and Eurozone crisis: The divided states of Europe," Post-Print halshs-03781898, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:56:y:2018:i:5:p:1019-1035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.