IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v44y2006i2p349-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland Compared

Author

Listed:
  • LUCIA QUAGLIA
  • EDWARD MOXON‐BROWNE

Abstract

What makes a ‘good’ EU presidency? A comparison between the two most recent Italian and Irish experiences in office can be instrumental in evaluating the crucial factors that affect presidency performance. The argument is developed in three main stages. Firstly, four key roles are selected in order to benchmark presidencies. Secondly, these roles are applied to the empirical record as criteria to devise a score‐card of the two presidencies under consideration. Thirdly, presidency‐specific factors are elicited and analysed, arguing that intangible assets, such as knowledge of EU affairs (process expertise, content expertise and information); political credibility and reputation; and general attitudes towards European integration, are crucial in performing the roles of president‐in‐office effectively and legitimately.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Quaglia & Edward Moxon‐Browne, 2006. "What Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland Compared," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 349-368, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i:2:p:349-368
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00626.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00626.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00626.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna-Lena Högenauer, 2016. "Luxembourg's EU Council Presidency: Adapting Routines to New Circumstances," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 91-100, September.
    2. Svetličič Marjan & Cerjak Kira, 2015. "Small Countries’ EU Council Presidency and the Realisation of their National Interests: The Case of Slovenia," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(74), pages 5-39, December.
    3. Brigid Laffan, 2014. "In the Shadow of Austerity: Ireland's Seventh Presidency of the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 90-98, November.
    4. Maurizio Carbone, 2015. "Beyond the Telemachus complex: courses, discourses and the 2014 Italian Presidency of the Council of the European Union-super-," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53, pages 83-92, September.
    5. Niemann, Arne, 2011. "Conceptualising Commom Commercial Policy Treaty revision: explaining stagnancy and dynamics from the Amsterdam IGC to the Treaty of Lisbon," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 15, October.
    6. Olga Eisele & Tobias Heidenreich & Nina Kriegler & Pamina Syed Ali & Hajo G. Boomgaarden, 2023. "A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 327-347, June.
    7. Austė Vaznonytė, 2020. "The rotating Presidency of the Council of the EU – Still an agenda-setter?," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 497-518, September.
    8. Daunis Auers & Toms Rostoks, 2016. "The 2015 Latvian Presidency of the Council of the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 83-90, September.
    9. Ian Manners, 2013. "The 2012 Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union: Bridging Exclusion," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51, pages 70-79, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i:2:p:349-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.