IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v44y2006i1p57-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU and Nato: Two Competing Models for a Common Defence Policy

Author

Listed:
  • HANNA OJANEN

Abstract

European integration in security and defence was for a long time seen as impossible or at least highly unlikely. Even otherwise contradictory theories of European integration shared the assumption that the specific character of this field explained the absence of integration. Recent developments challenge this assumption. Maintaining instead that security and defence are amenable to integration, one can, drawing from the same integration theories, see two alternative models of a common defence policy emerging. A wholly new type of supranational defence may become reality within the EU, possibly challenged by the EU's close co‐operation, or ‘fusion’, with the intergovernmentalism of Nato.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Ojanen, 2006. "The EU and Nato: Two Competing Models for a Common Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 57-76, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i:1:p:57-76
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00614.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00614.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00614.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petros Violakis, 2023. "Putting the Common Security and Defense Policy in the Eastern Mediterranean under Scrutiny: Türkiye’s Conflicting Role," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Harald Schoen, 2008. "Identity, Instrumental Self-Interest and Institutional Evaluations," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(1), pages 5-29, March.
    3. Gëzim Visoka & John Doyle, 2016. "Neo‐Functional Peace: The European Union Way of Resolving Conflicts," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 862-877, July.
    4. Ulrich Krotz, 2008. "The (Beginning of the) End of the Political Unity of the West? Four Scenarios of North Atlantic Futures," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 31, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    5. Chris J. Bickerton & Bastien Irondelle & Anand Menon, 2011. "Security Co‐operation beyond the Nation‐State: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Anand Menon, 2011. "Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 83-100, January.
    7. Norheim-Martinsen, Per Martin, 2010. "Managing the Civil-Military Interface in the EU: Creating an Organisation Fit for Purpose," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    8. Magnus Ekengren & Simon Hollis, 2020. "Explaining the European Union's Security Role in Practice," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 616-635, May.
    9. Ulrich Krotz, 2009. "Momentum and Impediments: Why Europe Won't Emerge as a Full Political Actor on the World Stage Soon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 555-578, June.
    10. Christoph O. Meyer & Eva Strickmann, 2011. "Solidifying Constructivism: How Material and Ideational Factors Interact in European Defence," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 61-81, January.
    11. Ulrich Krotz, 2009. "Momentum and Impediments: Why Europe Won't Emerge as a Full Political Actor on the World Stage Soon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 555-578, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i:1:p:57-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.