IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v51y2024i3-4p691-716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disclosure specificity: Evidence from book‐to‐bill ratios

Author

Listed:
  • Kimball Chapman
  • Zachary Kaplan
  • Chase Potter

Abstract

We investigate whether managers vary disclosure specificity strategically, by examining how the voluntary disclosure of a key performance indicator, the book‐to‐bill (BTB) ratio (the ratio of orders received to orders billed), varies with future firm performance. Consistent with theoretical predictions from prior research, we find that managers are more likely to provide precise BTB disclosures when the news is positive, while offering less precise disclosures when the news is negative. We find that managers strategically vary specificity more when valuation incentives are higher and monitoring is lower. We find that the tone of qualitative descriptions is informative, with or without precise disclosure, inconsistent with the predictions of strategic withholding models. Our results are consistent with persuasion models in which managers vary the specificity of news strategically, to affect the weight stakeholders place on the signal.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimball Chapman & Zachary Kaplan & Chase Potter, 2024. "Disclosure specificity: Evidence from book‐to‐bill ratios," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3-4), pages 691-716, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:51:y:2024:i:3-4:p:691-716
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12784
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:51:y:2024:i:3-4:p:691-716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.