IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v45y2018i3-4p259-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non†GAAP reporting: Evidence from academia and current practice

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk E. Black
  • Theodore E. Christensen
  • Jack T. Ciesielski
  • Benjamin C. Whipple

Abstract

The number of firms reporting earnings on a non†GAAP basis has increased dramatically over the last decade, and non†GAAP reporting is now commonplace in capital markets. This proliferation of non†GAAP reporting has renewed both regulators’ and standard setters’ interests in these alternative performance metrics. For example, the SEC, FASB, and IASB have all recently questioned what this increasing reporting trend means for IFRS†and US†GAAP†based reporting and whether these measures are misleading to investors. This increasing focus on non†GAAP metrics motivates us to synthesize the nearly two decades of research on non†GAAP reporting to provide insights on what academics have learned to date about this reporting practice. Then, we utilize a novel dataset of detailed non†GAAP disclosures to provide new descriptive evidence on current trends in non†GAAP reporting and its recent proliferation. Finally, we discuss important questions for future researchers to consider in moving the literature forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk E. Black & Theodore E. Christensen & Jack T. Ciesielski & Benjamin C. Whipple, 2018. "Non†GAAP reporting: Evidence from academia and current practice," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3-4), pages 259-294, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:45:y:2018:i:3-4:p:259-294
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12298
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:45:y:2018:i:3-4:p:259-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.