IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v28y2001i5-6p715-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Empirical Distribution of UK and US Stock Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Richard D. F. Harris
  • C. Coskun Küçüközmen

Abstract

There is now substantial evidence that daily equity returns are not normally distributed but instead display significant leptokurtosis and, in many cases, skewness. Considerable effort has been made in order to capture these empirical characteristics using a range of ad hoc statistical distributions. In this paper, we investigate the distribution of daily, weekly and monthly equity returns in the UK and US using two very flexible families of distributions that have been recently introduced: the exponential generalised beta (EGB) and the skewed generalised‐t (SGT). These distributions permit very diverse levels of skewness and kurtosis and, between them, nest many of the distributions previously considered in the literature. Both the EGB and the SGT provide a very substantial improvement over the normal distribution in both markets. Moreover, for daily returns, we strongly reject the restrictions on the EGB and SGT implied by most of the distributions that are commonly used for modelling equity returns, including the student‐t, the power exponential and the logistic distributions. Instead, our preferred distributions for daily returns are the generalised‐t for the US and the skewed‐t for the UK, both of which are members of the SGT family. For weekly returns, our preferred distributions are the student‐t for the UK and the skewed‐t for the US, while for monthly returns, our preferred distributions are the EBR12 for the UK and the logistic for the US. We consider the implications of our findings for the implementation of value‐at‐risk, a risk management methodology that rests heavily on the distributional characteristics of returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard D. F. Harris & C. Coskun Küçüközmen, 2001. "The Empirical Distribution of UK and US Stock Returns," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5‐6), pages 715-740, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:28:y:2001:i:5-6:p:715-740
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00391
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5957.00391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dashti Moghaddam, M. & Serota, R.A., 2021. "Combined multiplicative–Heston model for stochastic volatility," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 561(C).
    2. Juraj Pekár & Mário Pčolár, 2022. "Empirical distribution of daily stock returns of selected developing and emerging markets with application to financial risk management," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 699-731, June.
    3. Hang Lin & Lixin Liu & Zhengjun Zhang, 2023. "Tail Risk Signal Detection through a Novel EGB2 Option Pricing Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-32, July.
    4. Wang, Xinyu & Luo, Yi & Wang, Zhuqing & Xu, Yan & Wu, Congxin, 2021. "The impact of economic policy uncertainty on volatility of China’s financial stocks: An empirical analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:28:y:2001:i:5-6:p:715-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.