IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v63y2012i6p1092-1107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting content curation communities: The case of the Encyclopedia of Life

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Rotman
  • Kezia Procita
  • Derek Hansen
  • Cynthia Sims Parr
  • Jennifer Preece

Abstract

This article explores the opportunities and challenges of creating and sustaining large‐scale “content curation communities” through an in‐depth case study of the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL). Content curation communities are large‐scale crowdsourcing endeavors that aim to curate existing content into a single repository, making these communities different from content creation communities such as Wikipedia. In this article, we define content curation communities and provide examples of this increasingly important genre. We then follow by presenting EOL, a compelling example of a content curation community, and describe a case study of EOL based on analysis of interviews, online discussions, and survey data. Our findings are characterized into two broad categories: information integration and social integration. Information integration challenges at EOL include the need to (a) accommodate and validate multiple sources and (b) integrate traditional peer reviewed sources with user‐generated, nonpeer‐reviewed content. Social integration challenges at EOL include the need to (a) establish the credibility of open‐access resources within the scientific community and (b) facilitate collaboration between experts and novices. After identifying the challenges, we discuss the potential strategies EOL and other content curation communities can use to address them, and provide technical, content, and social design recommendations for overcoming them.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Rotman & Kezia Procita & Derek Hansen & Cynthia Sims Parr & Jennifer Preece, 2012. "Supporting content curation communities: The case of the Encyclopedia of Life," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1092-1107, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:6:p:1092-1107
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Wu & Jessica Kropczynski & Raquel Prates & John M. Carroll, 2018. "Understanding How GitHub Supports Curation Repositories," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Eleftheria Vasileiadou, 2014. "Crowd science: it is not just a matter of time (or funding)," Working Papers 14-05, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2014.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:6:p:1092-1107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.