IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v63y2012i11p2269-2282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting syntactic and semantic relationships between terms for opinion retrieval

Author

Listed:
  • Liqiang Guo
  • Xiaojun Wan

Abstract

Opinion retrieval is the task of finding documents that express an opinion about a given query. A key challenge in opinion retrieval is to capture the query‐related opinion score of a document. Existing methods rely mainly on the proximity information between the opinion terms and the query terms to address the key challenge. In this study, we propose to incorporate the syntactic and semantic information of terms into a probabilistic model to capture the query‐related opinion score more accurately. The syntactic tree structure of a sentence is used to evaluate the modifying probability between an opinion term and a noun within the sentence with a tree kernel method. Moreover, WordNet and the probabilistic topic model are used to evaluate the semantic relatedness between any noun and the given query. The experimental results over standard TREC baselines on the benchmark BLOG06 collection demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, in comparison with the proximity‐based method and other baselines.

Suggested Citation

  • Liqiang Guo & Xiaojun Wan, 2012. "Exploiting syntactic and semantic relationships between terms for opinion retrieval," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2269-2282, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:11:p:2269-2282
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22724
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.22724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:11:p:2269-2282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.