IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v62y2011i4p748-760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding a good query‐related topic for boosting pseudo‐relevance feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Ye
  • Jimmy Xiangji Huang
  • Hongfei Lin

Abstract

Pseudo‐relevance feedback (PRF) via query expansion (QE) assumes that the top‐ranked documents from the first‐pass retrieval are relevant. The most informative terms in the pseudo‐relevant feedback documents are then used to update the original query representation in order to boost the retrieval performance. Most current PRF approaches estimate the importance of the candidate expansion terms based on their statistics on document level. However, a document for PRF may consist of different topics, which may not be all related to the query even if the document is judged relevant. The main argument of this article is the proposal to conduct PRF on a granularity smaller than on the document level. In this article, we propose a topic‐based feedback model with three different strategies for finding a good query‐related topic based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model. The experimental results on four representative TREC collections show that QE based on the derived topic achieves statistically significant improvements over a strong feedback model in the language modeling framework, which updates the query representation based on the top‐ranked documents.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Ye & Jimmy Xiangji Huang & Hongfei Lin, 2011. "Finding a good query‐related topic for boosting pseudo‐relevance feedback," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 748-760, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:62:y:2011:i:4:p:748-760
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:62:y:2011:i:4:p:748-760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.