IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v57y2006i13p1794-1803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual property information: A comparative analysis of main information providers

Author

Listed:
  • Mechtild Stock
  • Wolfgang G. Stock

Abstract

After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel‐Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co‐patent‐citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).

Suggested Citation

  • Mechtild Stock & Wolfgang G. Stock, 2006. "Intellectual property information: A comparative analysis of main information providers," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(13), pages 1794-1803, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:57:y:2006:i:13:p:1794-1803
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.20498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.20498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Shan Chen & Chun-Yu Shih & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2014. "Explore the new relationship between patents and market value: a panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1145-1159, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:57:y:2006:i:13:p:1794-1803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.