IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v51y2000i11p989-1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactive query expansion: A user‐based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment

Author

Listed:
  • Efthimis N. Efthimiadis

Abstract

A user‐centered investigation of interactive query expansion within the context of a relevance feedback system is presented in this article. Data were collected from 25 searches using the INSPEC database. The data collection mechanisms included questionnaires, transaction logs, and relevance evaluations. The results discuss issues that relate to query expansion, retrieval effectiveness, the correspondence of the on‐line‐to‐off‐line relevance judgments, and the selection of terms for query expansion by users (interactive query expansion). The main conclusions drawn from the results of the study are that: (1) one‐third of the terms presented to users in a list of candidate terms for query expansion was identified by the users as potentially useful for query expansion. (2) These terms were mainly judged as either variant expressions (synonyms) or alternative (related) terms to the initial query terms. However, a substantial portion of the selected terms were identified as representing new ideas. (3) The relationships identified between the five best terms selected by the users for query expansion and the initial query terms were that: (a) 34% of the query expansion terms have no relationship or other type of correspondence with a query term; (b) 66% of the remaining query expansion terms have a relationship to the query terms. These relationships were: narrower term (46%), broader term (3%), related term (17%). (4) The results provide evidence for the effectiveness of interactive query expansion. The initial search produced on average three highly relevant documents; the query expansion search produced on average nine further highly relevant documents. The conclusions highlight the need for more research on: interactive query expansion, the comparative evaluation of automatic vs. interactive query expansion, the study of weighted Web‐based or Web‐accessible retrieval systems in operational environments, and for user studies in searching ranked retrieval systems in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Efthimis N. Efthimiadis, 2000. "Interactive query expansion: A user‐based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(11), pages 989-1003.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:11:p:989-1003
    DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:99993.0.CO;2-B
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:99993.0.CO;2-B
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:99993.0.CO;2-B?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donghyun Lee & Suna Kang & Jungwoo Shin, 2017. "Determinants of Pro-Environmental Consumption: Multicountry Comparison Based upon Big Data Search," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Veda C. Storey & Andrew Burton-Jones & Vijayan Sugumaran & Sandeep Purao, 2008. "CONQUER: A Methodology for Context-Aware Query Processing on the World Wide Web," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 3-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:11:p:989-1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.