Finance, Politics, and the Accounting for Stock Options

The politics of option accounting crosses party lines, reflecting both the interests of the affected constituencies and the desire for power over standard setting. House Bill HR‐3574, which mandates an assumption of zero stock price volatility, runs counter to the recently passed Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) rule requiring fair‐value expensing of stock options. For any option issued at or out of the money, where strike prices are normally set, expense recognition is zero under this bill's mandated assumption. Besides excessive use of stock options, the lack of a “final peace” in the option accounting war appears to have encouraged another questionable corporate practice. This article examines a sample of “six‐and‐one restructurings,” exchanges of options in which expensing of re‐priced (deep out‐of‐the‐money) options can be avoided if employees wait at least six months and one day before receiving new options. The authors found that market‐adjusted stock prices tend to decrease during the six‐month period before the strike price is reset. This result provides one more reason why companies should be required to use fair‐value option pricing models to expense options.