IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v87y2019i1p127-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extrapolation‐based Bandwidth Selectors: A Review and Comparative Study with Discussion on Bivariate Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Wang

Abstract

Cross‐validation is a widely used tool in selecting the smoothing parameter in a non‐parametric procedure. However, it suffers from large sampling variation and tends to overfit the data set. Many attempts have been made to reduce the variance of cross‐validation. This paper focuses on two recent proposals of extrapolation‐based cross‐validation bandwidth selectors: indirect cross‐validation and subsampling‐extrapolation technique. In univariate case, we notice that using a fixed value parameter surrogate for indirect cross‐validation works poorly when the true density is hard to estimate, while the subsampling‐extrapolation technique is more robust to non‐normality. We investigate whether a hybrid bandwidth selector could benefit from the advantages of both approaches and compare the performance of different extrapolation‐based bandwidth selectors through simulation studies, real data analyses and large sample theory. A discussion on their extension to bivariate case is also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Wang, 2019. "Extrapolation‐based Bandwidth Selectors: A Review and Comparative Study with Discussion on Bivariate Applications," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 87(1), pages 127-151, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:87:y:2019:i:1:p:127-151
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:87:y:2019:i:1:p:127-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.