IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/irvfin/v22y2022i1p286-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firm's tax aggressiveness under mandatory CSR regime: Evidence after mandatory CSR regulation of India

Author

Listed:
  • Mehul Raithatha
  • Tara Shankar Shaw

Abstract

In this study, we use the mandatory CSR spending regulation implemented by India in 2015 to examine whether firms that comply with the regulation change their tax aggressiveness. We document that firms that comply with CSR regulation end up having less tax aggression which supports the argument that enhanced visibility and firm‐level reputational concerns play a vital role in shaping up the relationship between CSR and taxation policy. Our results are consistent with the number of robustness checks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehul Raithatha & Tara Shankar Shaw, 2022. "Firm's tax aggressiveness under mandatory CSR regime: Evidence after mandatory CSR regulation of India," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 286-294, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:irvfin:v:22:y:2022:i:1:p:286-294
    DOI: 10.1111/irfi.12348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12348
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irfi.12348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lan Guo & Ling Yang, 2023. "The Corporate Economic Influence and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Aleksei V. Bogoviz & Svetlana V. Lobova & Alexander N. Alekseev, 2022. "The Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility Based on Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Strategies: International Experience and the Risks for Profit," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:irvfin:v:22:y:2022:i:1:p:286-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1369-412X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.