IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v34y2010i2p243-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning and the Technological Society: Discussing the London Plan

Author

Listed:
  • YVONNE RYDIN

Abstract

The sustainable development agenda has influenced the focus of urban planning policy in many countries and localities; this article argues that its influence has been much more widespread, affecting not just the content of planning but also its discourses and practices. This reflects more profound shifts within society — shifts that put the governance of technology firmly centre‐place. Using a case study of the London Plan (the spatial development strategy for London), the discussion considers how recent debates on the Plan are being shaped by the need to focus on technological issues. Using Barry's and Feenberg's explorations of the technological society, the analysis identifies key features such as the contestation of evidence and expertise, the focus on technical details and the resultant reframing of policy discourse. The article concludes with suggestions as to the ways in which planning may change in the future. Résumé Les préoccupations liées au développement durable ont influé sur le cœur des politiques d’urbanisme dans de nombreux pays et localités. Leur influence s’est révélée beaucoup plus vaste, affectant non seulement le contenu, mais aussi les discours et pratiques en matière d’aménagement. Cette situation traduit des mutations plus profondes de la société, mutations qui donnent à la gouvernance de la technologie une solide prééminence. À partir d’une étude de cas sur le London Plan (stratégie d’aménagement spatial de Londres), est examinée la façon dont les récents débats sur le Plan sont modelés par la nécessité de s’attacher aux aspects technologiques. S’appuyant sur les explorations de la société technologique menées par Barry et par Feenberg, l’analyse identifie des caractéristiques dominantes telles que la contestation des éléments factuels et de l’expertise, la focalisation sur des détails techniques et, donc, le recadrage du discours de l’action publique. La conclusion présente les possibles évolutions futures de l’aménagement du territoire.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne Rydin, 2010. "Planning and the Technological Society: Discussing the London Plan," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 243-259, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:34:y:2010:i:2:p:243-259
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00901.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00901.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00901.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liam James Heaphy, 2018. "The challenges of aligning the scales of urban climate science and climate policy in London and Manchester," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 609-628, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:34:y:2010:i:2:p:243-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.