IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v23y1999i2p232-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informal Spaces: The Geography of Informal Economic Activities in Brussels

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Kesteltoot
  • Henk Meert

Abstract

This paper unravels the relations between different categories of the informal economy and their spatial distribution in the geographical setting of Brussels. Micro perspectives (households as economic agents) and macro perspectives (the informal economy related to economic recession) are combined in order to deal with categories of informal activities which are homogenous in terms of their spatial logic. In the first part we review several classifications of informal economic activities and assess them in terms of their congruence with the distinctions of economic actors and spatial logic. The second part elaborates on the raisons d’être of three large categories of informal economic activities in relation to urban development and on the production environments of these activities in Brussels: the domestic sector and suburban development; economic recession and survival strategies in the inner city; and, finally, flexibility and informalization in urban light industry. Polanyi’s concept of modes of economic integration (market, redistribution and reciprocity) offers a powerful tool to understand informal economic activities as a set of interrelations between households and other economic actors in order to gain access to their living resources — Ce texte analyse les relations entre différentes catégories d’activités économiques informelles et leur répartition spatiale à Bruxelles. Les perspectives micro (les ménages en tant qu’agents économiques) et macro (l’économie informelle liée à la récession économique) sont combinées pour aboutir à des catégories d’activit’és’économiques informelles homogènes en termes de logique spatiale. Dans une première partie nous considérons plusieurs classifications des activités économiques informelles pour évaluer au niveau théorique leur congruence avec les types d’acteurs et les logiques spatiales. La seconde partie décrit les raisons d’?tre de trois grandes catégories d’activités économiques informelles et les met en relation avec le développement urbain et leurs milieux de production à Bruxelles. On distingue ainsi le secteur domestique liéà la péri‐urbanisation, les stratégies de survie liées à la récession dans le centre‐ville et la flexibilité et l’informalisation de l’industrie urbaine. Le concept de modes d’intégration économique de Polanyi (échange marchand, redistribution et réciprocité) constitue un outil d’analyse efficace pour comprendre ces activités économiques informelles en tant que combinaisons précises d’interrelations entre ménages et autres acteurs économiques permettant aux premiers d’accéder à leurs moyens d’existence.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Kesteltoot & Henk Meert, 1999. "Informal Spaces: The Geography of Informal Economic Activities in Brussels," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 232-251, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:23:y:1999:i:2:p:232-251
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00193
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.00193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stelios Gialis, 2006. "Informal Forms of Work and the Fragmentation of Local Labour Markets: The Case of Part–Time Work in Greece," ERSA conference papers ersa06p807, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Yanliu Lin & Pu Hao & Stan Geertman, 2015. "A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese ‘villages in the city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1774-1790, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:23:y:1999:i:2:p:232-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.