IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v35y2020i1p409-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing the length of clinic visits: A process analysis case report

Author

Listed:
  • Jamison V. Kovach
  • Madhumita Akhuli

Abstract

Because the University of Houston Student Health Center often had more demand for services than available appointments, the aim of this study was to streamline their clinic visit process. While appointments were scheduled for 20 minutes, the clinic's patient visit cycle time (from check‐in to check‐out) averaged 70 minutes. This report demonstrats how to perform process analysis using failure modes and effects analysis in order to identify the highest priority cause of waste and how to conduct a detailed evaluation of ideas using a prioritization matrix in order to select the best solution to help streamline a process. Analysis of this clinic's visit process identified that patients (mostly international students) asking many questions during their appointment regarding issues not directly related to their care led to long clinic visits. To address this issue, the clinic recruited a team of international students to create a frequently asked questions video with answers, and the final video was then uploaded to the clinic's Facebook page. Comparing before and after the video was posted showed the clinic's average time for a clinic visit was reduced by more than 15%, and it was able to accommodate nearly 100 additional patient visits per month.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamison V. Kovach & Madhumita Akhuli, 2020. "Reducing the length of clinic visits: A process analysis case report," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 409-416, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:35:y:2020:i:1:p:409-416
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2878
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:35:y:2020:i:1:p:409-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.