IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v33y2018i2p405-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding ED performance after the implementation of activity‐based funding

Author

Listed:
  • Ghasem‐Sam Toloo
  • John Burke
  • Julia Crilly
  • Ged Williams
  • Bridie McCann
  • Gerry FitzGerald
  • Anthony Bell

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to describe emergency department (ED) activities and staffing after the introduction of activity‐based funding (ABF) to highlight the challenges of new funding arrangements and their implementation. Methods A retrospective study of public hospital EDs in Queensland, Australia, was undertaken for 2013‐2014. The ED and hospital characteristics are described to evaluate the alignment between activity and resourcing levels and their impact on performance. Results Twenty EDs participated (74% response rate). Weighted activity units (WAUs) and nursing staff varied based on hospital type and size. Larger hospital EDs had on average 9076 WAUs and 13 full time equivalent (FTE) nursing staff per 1000 WAUs; smaller EDs had on average 4587 WAUs and 10.3 FTE nursing staff per 1000 WAUs. Medical staff was relatively consistent (8.1‐8.7 FTE per 1000 WAUs). The proportion of patients admitted, discharged, or transferred within 4 hours ranged from 73% to 79%. The ED medical and nursing staffing numbers did not correlate with the 4‐hour performance. Conclusion Substantial variation exists across Queensland EDs when resourcing service delivery in an activity‐based funding environment. Historical inequity persists in the staffing profiles for regional and outer metropolitan departments. The lack of association between resourcing and performance metrics provides opportunity for further investigation of efficient models of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghasem‐Sam Toloo & John Burke & Julia Crilly & Ged Williams & Bridie McCann & Gerry FitzGerald & Anthony Bell, 2018. "Understanding ED performance after the implementation of activity‐based funding," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 405-413, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:2:p:405-413
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2475
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:2:p:405-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.