IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v5y2014i4p439-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nascent Spirit of New York or Ghost of Arms Control Past?: The Normative Implications of the Arms Trade Treaty for Global Policymaking

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Bolton
  • Katelyn E. James

Abstract

type="graphical" xml:id="gpol12174-abs-0002"> Ultimately the strength of the ATT will come from its interpretation and implementation. This is something civil society and maximalist states can influence, through monitoring, discursive framing and naming and shaming.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Bolton & Katelyn E. James, 2014. "Nascent Spirit of New York or Ghost of Arms Control Past?: The Normative Implications of the Arms Trade Treaty for Global Policymaking," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5(4), pages 439-452, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:5:y:2014:i:4:p:439-452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/gpol.2014.5.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Bolton & Elizabeth Minor, 2016. "The Discursive Turn Arrives in Turtle Bay: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons’ Operationalization of Critical IR Theories," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(3), pages 385-395, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:5:y:2014:i:4:p:439-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.