IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v54y2019i2p265-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory Soft Interventions in the Chinese Market: Compliance Effects and Impact on Option Market Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmy E. Hilliard
  • Haoran Zhang

Abstract

Securities Laws in China are administered by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). The CSRC has great flexibility in administering securities laws since the committee represents the will of the state. Under the state‐controlled financial system, the CSRC works closely with state‐controlled financial firms and suggests, but does not mandate, actions to be taken in the equity market, especially during periods of extreme market stress. These suggestions, or soft interventions, have been used to block trades associated with short sales, significantly reducing short‐sales volume. With daily and intraday data, we investigate the impact of these interventions on put‐call parity and implied volatilities. There is overwhelming evidence of increased deviations from put‐call parity and changes in implied volatility after soft interventions. Our results are robust after allowing for bid‐ask spreads, taxes, transaction costs, and difference‐in‐differences comparisons with control securities in the Hong Kong market.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmy E. Hilliard & Haoran Zhang, 2019. "Regulatory Soft Interventions in the Chinese Market: Compliance Effects and Impact on Option Market Efficiency," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 54(2), pages 265-301, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:54:y:2019:i:2:p:265-301
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.12189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12189
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.12189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao, Yuhan & Liu, Qiang & Guo, Shuxin, 2021. "Pricing kernel monotonicity and term structure: Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Jimmy E. Hilliard & Haoran Zhang, 2020. "The impact of soft intervention on the Chinese financial futures market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 374-391, March.
    3. Ye, Wuyi & Chen, Pengzhan & Shi, Yining & Liu, Xiaoquan, 2022. "Trading restriction and the choice for derivatives," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Li, Pengshi & Xian, Aichuan & Lin, Yan, 2021. "What determines volatility smile in China?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 326-335.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:54:y:2019:i:2:p:265-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.