This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

An Empirical Comparison of Bankruptcy Models

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mossman, Charles E, et al
Abstract

Four types of bankruptcy prediction models based on financial statement ratios, cash flows, stock returns, and return standard deviations are compared. Based on a ample of bankruptcies from 1980 to 1991, results indicate that no existing model of bankruptcy adequately captures the data. During the last fiscal year preceding bankruptcy, none of the individual models may be excluded without a loss in explanatory power. If considered in isolation, the cash flow model discriminates most consistently two to three years before bankruptcy. By comparison, the ratio model is the best single model during the year immediately preceding bankruptcy. Quasi-jack-knifing procedures suggest that none of the models can reliably predict bankruptcy more than two years in advance. Copyright 1998 by MIT Press.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Eastern Finance Association in its journal The Financial Review.

Volume (Year): 33 (1998)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Pages: 35-53
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:33:y:1998:i:2:p:35-53

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.easternfinance.org/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0732-8516

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Hubert Ooghe & Sofie Balcaen, 2002. "Are failure prediction models transferable from one country to another? An empirical study using financial statements," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2002-3, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School. [Downloadable!]
  2. Sanvicente, A. Z & Minardi, A. M. A. F, 1998. "Identificação de indicadores contábeis significativos para previsão de concordata de empresas," Finance Lab Working Papers flwp_3, Finance Lab, Ibmec São Paulo. [Downloadable!]
  3. John Y. Campbell & Jens Hilscher & Jan Szilagyi, 2006. "In Search of Distress Risk," NBER Working Papers 12362, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. Sung Wook. Joh, 2004. "The Korean Economic Crisis and Corporate Governance System," NBER Chapters, in: Governance, Regulation, and Privatization in the Asia-Pacific Region, NBER East Asia Seminar on Economics, Volume 12, pages 129-158 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
  5. Maurice Peat, 2003. "Factors Affecting the Probability of Bankruptcy," Working Paper Series 130, School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology, Sydney. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? A few items listed on IDEAS are over 2000 years old!

This page was last updated on 2009-11-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.