IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v55y2002i1p78-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards the ‘cult of the equity’? Insurance companies and the interwar capital market[I am grate]

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Scott

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Scott, 2002. "Towards the ‘cult of the equity’? Insurance companies and the interwar capital market[I am grate]," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 55(1), pages 78-104, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:55:y:2002:i:1:p:78-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-0289.00215
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crafts, Nicholas, 2017. "The Postwar British Productivity Failure," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 350, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    2. David Chambers, 2009. "Gentlemanly capitalism revisited: a case study of the underpricing of initial public offerings on the London Stock Exchange, 1946–861," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(s1), pages 31-56, August.
    3. Janette Rutterford, 2012. "Valuing Equities in the UK and the US: Fashions and Trends," Chapters, in: Geoffrey Poitras (ed.), Handbook of Research on Stock Market Globalization, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Hutson, Elaine, 2005. "The early managed fund industry: Investment trusts in 19th century Britain," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 439-454.
    5. David Chambers, 2006. "Gentlemanly capitalism revisited: a case study of the underpricing of Initial Public Offerings on the London Stock Exchange, 1946-86," Working Papers 6016, Economic History Society.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:55:y:2002:i:1:p:78-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.