IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v36y2024i1p611-629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are democratic regime and the magnitude of the informal economy robust determinants of human impacts on the environment? An extreme bounds analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Vourvoulia
  • Athanasios Kampas

Abstract

There is a vast body of literature dedicated to identifying the major drivers that explain human impacts on the environment. In this study, we utilize the STIRPAT framework to assess whether two controversial factors should be considered when examining how humans affect the environment. Specifically, we investigate whether the quality of the democratic regime and the size of the informal economy play significant roles in determining human impacts on the environment. To address this question, we employ the extreme bounds analysis (EBA) to characterize these drivers as either robust or fragile. Based on the findings of this paper, both variables are classified as fragile, suggesting that they may not fully explain human impacts on the environment. We have taken great care in interpreting the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Vourvoulia & Athanasios Kampas, 2024. "Are democratic regime and the magnitude of the informal economy robust determinants of human impacts on the environment? An extreme bounds analysis," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 611-629, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:611-629
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:611-629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.