IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v31y2019i3p428-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor markets and cultural values: Evidence from Japanese and American views about caregiving immigrants

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret E. Peters
  • Rieko Kage
  • Frances Rosenbluth
  • Seiki Tanaka

Abstract

One overlooked reason for the persistence of distinct cultural values across rich democracies, we argue, is a country's labor market structure. Parents seeking to position their children for long‐term success would do well to instill values consistent with requirements of the labor market in the country where their children are likely to work. To the extent that labor markets are fluid, as in the United States, parents should teach their children to be resourceful and creative. In countries like Japan with relatively rigid labor markets, where workers have one chance to land a long‐term contract with a leading company, parents instead should instill the values of hard work and respect for authority. We find evidence consistent with this argument in survey experiments about attitudes in the United States and Japan about the desirability of employing immigrants for care work, and what values the immigrant care workers should hold. We also find evidence of indirect norm creation. American and Japanese respondents prefer immigrants—not just caregiving immigrants—whose values align with their country's type of valued human capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret E. Peters & Rieko Kage & Frances Rosenbluth & Seiki Tanaka, 2019. "Labor markets and cultural values: Evidence from Japanese and American views about caregiving immigrants," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 428-464, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:31:y:2019:i:3:p:428-464
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12140
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:31:y:2019:i:3:p:428-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.