IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econpa/v33y2014i3p220-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bank Fundamentals, Executive Compensation and Public Perception of Banks in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Ameeta Jain
  • John Guo
  • Chien-Ting Lin

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="ecpa12081-abs-0001"> Public perception of banks in Australia is relatively poor compared to firms in other major services sectors. This study explores a number of potential sources of negative public opinion. We find that bank profits are similar to firms in other sectors after adjustment for firm size. Average bank executive remuneration as a proportion of total staff costs are also lower than those in other sectors. Finally, Australian banks not only pay a higher average effective tax rate than their counterparts in OECD countries but are also closest to their statutory corporate tax rates. Our findings therefore suggest that poor public perception of banks is based on the flawed claims of generating excessive profits, overpaying bank executives, and underpaying taxes and is not justified.

Suggested Citation

  • Ameeta Jain & John Guo & Chien-Ting Lin, 2014. "Bank Fundamentals, Executive Compensation and Public Perception of Banks in Australia," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 33(3), pages 220-232, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:3:p:220-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecpa.2014.33.issue-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:3:p:220-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.