IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econpa/v33y2014i1p55-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the Rising Costs of Electricity, Water and Gas – Would More Multi-Utility Firms Help?

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Abbott
  • Bruce Cohen

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="ecpa12061-abs-0001"> In the face of rising costs of living and stagnant productivity growth in the utilities sector, this article considers the scope for the greater bundling of services and the further development of multi-utility firms in Australia. With particular reference to the water sector, the article sets out the range of factors likely to contribute to, or inhibit such developments in Australia. In summary, this article concludes that the limited economies of scope that exist between the water and energy (gas and electricity) sectors, as compared to those within the energy sector, is a primary factor restricting the potential development of multi-utility firms. It also suggests the potential scope for bundling and development of multi-utility firms is likely to be inhibited by the lack of competition in the water sector, and to a lesser degree the predominant government ownership of that sector. Nonetheless, this article suggests further work should be undertaken to more accurately assess the potential for economies of scope in the delivery of utility services. It also notes that any change to facilitate bundling as a means to lower pricing also requires pricing regulation to be adapted to address any potential obfuscation by firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Abbott & Bruce Cohen, 2014. "Addressing the Rising Costs of Electricity, Water and Gas – Would More Multi-Utility Firms Help?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 55-66, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:1:p:55-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecpa.2014.33.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:1:p:55-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.