IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v41y2023i6ne12719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Thinking and Working Politically improve support for social business? Evidence from a water business in Cambodia

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Lyne

Abstract

Motivation Social business is business that aims primarily to achieve social ends, while at least covering its costs. Social business has been put forward as a means to achieve development aims, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Thinking and Working Politically (TWP) is an approach to ensure development interventions are politically feasible and not stymied by political opposition. Are the two approaches compatible? Purpose The article asks whether social business can ally with TWP for more effective development, taking a social business for water provision in Cambodia as a case in point. Methods and approach A review of development policy literature on social business and TWP is combined with data we collected from fieldwork in Cambodia from November 2018 to February 2019. We interviewed key informants from social business, UNICEF, and government in the capital. At two water kiosks in eastern Cambodia, one successful the other less so, we interviewed 2 kiosk operators, 20 customers, and local leaders; we held four focus groups of customers; and we observed operations at the kiosks. Data was analysed using an ethnographic, or immersive, qualitative approach. Findings In this case, UNICEF intuitively used TWP to connect a social business to government departments. Water kiosks depended heavily on local political dynamics. We found Commune officials mindful of their standing in local society who often had the interests of the local community in their hearts, but the compatibility of TWP and social business at the local project level is variable. Policy implications TWP can potentially help development actors supporting social business to make political connections, in this case to appropriate government departments and local official. The key, however, is to understand context. The danger is to view social business as a turnkey intervention that can be used without adaptation to context, without consideration of local politics. Donors supporting social business need to appraise each business, case by case. Donors might also want to consider the motivations of international companies partnering with social business, particularly when different development objectives might be in conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Lyne, 2023. "Does Thinking and Working Politically improve support for social business? Evidence from a water business in Cambodia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:6:n:e12719
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12719
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerard Clarke, 2021. "“Thinking and Working Politically”: The case of donor‐supported reform coalitions in the Philippines," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(3), pages 398-418, May.
    2. Kees Biekart & Erik Swyngedouw, 2013. "UN Water Report 2012: Depoliticizing Water," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(3), pages 823-835, May.
    3. Muhammad Yunus & Mario Biggeri & Enrico Testi, 2021. "Social Economy and Social Business Supporting Policies for Sustainable Human Development in a Post-COVID-19 World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    4. repec:lib:00johs:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:4-11 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Stefan Gold & Ilma Nur Chowdhury & Fahian Anisul Huq & Kristin Heinemann, 2020. "Social business collaboration at the bottom of the pyramid: The case of orchestration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 262-275, January.
    6. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2010. "The politics of narrating social entrepreneurship," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 85-108, March.
    7. Neil McCulloch & Laure‐Hélène Piron, 2019. "Thinking and Working Politically: Learning from practice. Overview to Special Issue," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(S1), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Angela Hoyos & Diego F. Angel‐Urdinola, 2019. "Assessing international organizations’ support to social enterprise," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(S2), pages 213-229, July.
    9. Muhammad Mustafizur Rahaman & Niaz Ahmed Khan, 2017. "Making international aid effective: An agenda for aligning aid to social business," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 96-117, October.
    10. Shahriar Akter & Nabila Jamal & Md Mahfuz Ashraf & Grace McCarthy & PS Varsha, 2020. "The Rise of the Social Business in Emerging Economies: A New Paradigm of Development," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 282-299, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manning, Stephan & Vavilov, Stanislav, 2023. "Global development agenda meets local opportunities: The rise of development-focused entrepreneurship support," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    2. Geoff Goodwin, 2018. "Water, Infrastructure and Power: Contention and Resistance in Post‐colonial Cities of the South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1616-1630, November.
    3. Chris Roche & John Cox & Mereani Rokotuibau & Peni Tawake & Yeshe Smith, 2020. "The Characteristics of Locally Led Development in the Pacific," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 136-146.
    4. Valero, Diana & Cook, Jess & Lee, Angus & Browne, Alison L. & Ellis, Rowan & Pancholi, Vidya Sagar & Hoolohan, Claire, 2023. "Addressing water poverty under climate crisis: implications for social policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120704, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Murat Arsel & Joshua Muldavin, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 993-1009, July.
    6. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Ritesh Shahi & Nadiya Parekh, 2022. "Financing Social Enterprises: An Upper Echelon Perspective," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 235-250, June.
    8. Nibedita Hazarika & Kriti Dagar, 2024. "Educational Technology to Promote Social Entrepreneurship Education in the COVID Pandemic Era," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 10(1), pages 41-50, January.
    9. Sam Hickey & Badru Bukenya, 2021. "The politics of promoting social cash transfers in Uganda: The potential and pitfalls of “thinking and working politically”," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(S1), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Gianluca Stefani & Mario Biggeri & Lucia Ferrone, 2022. "Sustainable Transitions Narratives: An Analysis of the Literature through Topic Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Aidan Craney, 2020. "Local Participation or Elite Capture in Sheep’s Clothing? A Conundrum of Locally Led Development," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 191-200.
    12. Mario Biggeri & Domenico Colucci & Nicola Doni & Vincenzo Valori, 2022. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Good Deeds, Business, Social and Environmental Responsibility in a Market Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Esha Shah & Janwillem Liebrand & Jeroen Vos & Gert Jan Veldwisch & Rutgerd Boelens, 2018. "The UN World Water Development Report 2016, Water and Jobs: A Critical Review," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 678-691, March.
    14. George Onofrei & Hung M. Nguyen & Min Zhang & Brian Fynes, 2020. "Building supply chain relational capital: The impact of supplier and customer leveraging on innovation performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3422-3434, December.
    15. Swann Bommier & Cécile Renouard, 2014. "On Equity in India's Water Supply Public-Private Partnerships," Working Papers hal-01023795, HAL.
    16. Carolin Brix‐Asala & Stefan Seuring & Philipp C. Sauer & Axel Zehendner & Lara Schilling, 2021. "Resolving the base of the pyramid inclusion paradox through supplier development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3208-3227, November.
    17. repec:hal:journl:hal-01023795 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Sabrina Tabares & Andrés Morales & Sara Calvo & Valentín Molina Moreno, 2021. "Unpacking B Corps’ Impact on Sustainable Development: An Analysis from Structuration Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Marina Apgar & Mieke Snijder & Grace Lyn Higdon & Sylvia Szabo, 2023. "Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 241-259, April.
    20. Jarosław Wenancjusz Przybytniowski & Stanisław Borkowski & Andrzej Grzebieniak & Petro Garasyim & Paweł Dziekański & Anna Ciesielska, 2022. "Social, Economic, and Financial Aspects of Modelling Sustainable Growth in the Irresponsible World during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    21. Huimin Li & Jianyuan Huang & Jiayun Liu, 2022. "External Support for Elderly Care Social Enterprises in China: A Government-Society-Family Framework of Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:6:n:e12719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.