IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v38y2020i3p387-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation policy, scientific research and economic performance: The case of Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Rouholah HamidiMotlagh
  • Ali Babaee
  • Ali Maleki
  • Mohammad Taghi Isaai

Abstract

Motivation Why, despite substantial investment in science and technology infrastructure during the last two decades, has Iran performed relatively poorly in terms of innovation and economic output? The investment has been wide‐ranging, from the inclusion of science and technology in the National Development Plans to the impressive growth in the number of science and technology parks and incubators. Iran is among the top five countries in terms of science and engineering graduates, and Iran's scientific publications are among the world's fastest‐growing. Purpose This study attempts to discover the reasons for this poor performance despite the investment. Approach and Method This is a qualitative study which tries to explore the research question through extensive archival data and semi‐structured interviews. We also use an inductive bottom‐up approach for data analysis, including open coding of collected data. Findings Our first level of analysis, based on National Innovation Systems studies, will show that there are two main causes: (a) Iran's industrial policies have been unsuccessful in encouraging domestic firms to export or exposing them to international competition. As a result, there are no meaningful incentives for them to approach technological frontiers by exploiting domestic science and technology infrastructures; (b) whereas universities and research centres have played an important role in the catch‐up process of other newly developed countries by engaging practically with the problems that face their societies, Iranian universities and research centres have become article‐publishing factories. Our second level of analysis will show that behind these two causes are other important latent factors: the power of incumbents and their efforts to maintain the status quo, and the “rules of the game” in the fields of science and technology which have discouraged hands‐on engagement. This study analyses strategic action literature, and proceeds to emphasize the role of incumbents and those “rules of the game” in inhibiting innovation and economic success. Policy Implications Effective innovation policy is not just about investing in science and technology infrastructure, but also about industrial policy, exposing domestic firms to international competition, overcoming entrenched interests and changing paths of career advancement in science and technology so that scientists are less inclined to pursue theoretical work and are encouraged to collaborate closely with business to solve practical problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rouholah HamidiMotlagh & Ali Babaee & Ali Maleki & Mohammad Taghi Isaai, 2020. "Innovation policy, scientific research and economic performance: The case of Iran," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(3), pages 387-407, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:38:y:2020:i:3:p:387-407
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asongu, Simplice & Odhiambo, Nicholas, 2022. "The of role economic growth in modulating mobile connectivity dynamics for financial inclusion in developing countries," MPRA Paper 119060, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Simplice A. Asongu & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2023. "Demand-Side Mobile Money Drivers of Financial Inclusion: Minimum Economic Growth Thresholds for Mobile Money Innovations," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4848-4865, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:38:y:2020:i:3:p:387-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.