IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v7y1999i2p167-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutuality versus Public Company – the Debate in Europe and the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Barry Howcroft

Abstract

The paper takes both an historical and an international perspective on the issue of mutuality and identifies a number of important themes in the current debate on mutuality versus “plc” conversion. The paper accordingly argues that in the short term the problem of excess capacity and the need to reduce capital is an important motive behind the recent spate of conversions. In the long term, however, the greater flexibility and the opportunities to raise additional capital which are associated with public company status are an important impetus behind this debate. In this respect, a number of alternatives to outright conversion which have not been sufficiently debated in the literature are identified and examined. Emphasis is placed on the European and US experience where savings and loans institutions have introduced a number of alternatives to outright flotation. In particular, the various merits and de‐merits of mutual holding companies are examined as an alternative to outright conversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Barry Howcroft, 1999. "Mutuality versus Public Company – the Debate in Europe and the USA," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 167-177, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:7:y:1999:i:2:p:167-177
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00144
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8683.00144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. N. Marshall & A. Pike & J. S. Pollard & J. Tomaney & S. Dawley & J. Gray, 2012. "Placing the run on northern rock," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 157-181, January.
    2. J.Cook & S.Deakin & A.Hughes, 2001. "Mutuality and Corporate Governance: The Evolution of UK Building Societies Following Deregulation," Working Papers wp205, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:7:y:1999:i:2:p:167-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.